In 99% of the cases, heterosexuals have all the procreative power. This does not need to be the fact though. It is easy for heterosexuals to breed, all they need to do is go out to a bar, get drunk, and go home together and they have a baby, or just simply have any kind of sex whatsoever, married or unmarried, planned or unplanned, willingly or through rape. It is this present condition, that heterosexuals have babies just by having sex, that makes heterosexuals so powerful and dangerous. Heterosexual reproduction is thoughtless and not systematic, unplanned children are born all the time and there is no such thing as a selection process, any man can take any woman and get her pregnant, that is not selective breeding but breeding based upon base desire and emotion. Heterosexuals breed because they desire each other, not because they are trying to create a certain kind of human being, eugenics is not the main objective of heterosexuality.
Gay men can have kids, but most times they don't. Why is this? Are gay men actually happy they have no kids? Do gay men like the freedom of being non-parents? Would gay men rather focus on their careers and hobbies than raise children? What if the answer to this is yes? That would be very bad for gay men as this would mean we have no motivation to reproduce even when we can do things like get surrogates. Also, if gay men don't want children generally, then why would they want to build artificial wombs and create artificial eggs as is proposed on this site? If there is no deep yearning to reproduce, then homosexuals will forever remain a powerless minority who have no place in shaping the biological and social destiny of the human race and who will eventually be outbred by prolific religious groups who hate them. If gay men do not naturally want children, then that needs to change, and there needs to be a purposeful conscious awakening among gay men to reproduce, even if it is against their natural desires. A prompted gay purposeful breeding is better than willed straight random haphazard breeding.
Gay men are often liberal and I am sure that many promote the idea of a low birthrate among the liberal heterosexuals who have given them freedoms. But gay men obviously have less influence over homophobes who will breed in large numbers despite what the gay man says is his environmentally friendly advice. If you are preaching a message of a low birthrate, only heterosexuals sympathetic to liberal causes like gay marriage will listen, the promotion of a low birth rate seems logical, but it only hurts gays as it is only the liberals who stop breeding. Also, if gay men want to breed they should also want to breed in large numbers, not in small numbers, we must compete with the enemies. Homophobes blame low straight birthrates on gays because they say that heterosexuals are trying to copy and compete with gays and their dual-income no children households and lifestyle. It's not our fault that straight people stop breeding because it is too hard, but if we are setting an example then we better set a good one and breed faster than they are.
But what about the gay lifestyle? Don't gay men like lots of entertainment and vacations and nice clothes and fancy restaurants? Isn't the stereotypical gay lifestyle hard to maintain with children? Yes, it is! Gay men need to become more simple, sex is free so that need not go, but yes, maybe we don't need as much fashion or as much art or as much fine dining or as many vacations. Not that we need to be acultural brutes, I am not saying live in a stoic environment, but yes, some sacrifices must be made. However, as is being promoted here, polygamy and collective child-rearing will make it easier for gays to have children but also a vibrant lifestyle. Having children watched in numbers by a few adults allows the other adults to go out to work and play much more often than what happens in a monogamous heterosexual household. While we do need to adjust, a polygamous collective-child-rearing lifestyle would mean we don't need to sacrifice too much, so we can balance reproduction and happiness, which heterosexuals are unable to do.
Gay men may not be psychologically programmed to reproduce, but that does not mean they need to lose the fight for reproduction. Heterosexuals pair off to procreate, but gay reproduction must be a group effort. Gay men must work as collectives to reproduce, with more money and more manpower and the ability to buy more wombs until artificial ones are produced. Reproduction for gays must be organized, systematic, and industrial... in comparison, the straight way must seem slow, burdensome, eventually more expensive, and taxing on the parents. The idea that the work of child-rearing may be too much for gay men may actually help us out. We don't want to do it the old way, so we must innovate and come up with something new... the fact that we don't do it the natural way may lead to creativity that will allow us to outbreed the heterosexuals. Unnature is our ally.
No comments:
Post a Comment